Friday, May 31, 2019

performance apraisal critique Essay -- essays research papers

The performance appraisal system used by our organization is do annually. The purpose of the look into is for employee as well as manager, to aptitude performance from the past year relating to the specific responsibilities and objective of that employee. This gives the opportunity for managers to give feedback on the strengths and increment atomic number 18as that are summarized from that previous year. Employees moldiness also use this opportunity to give feedback on how they can best perform and develop themselves. ThisAnnual review stop consonant is an opportunity to communicate and work together to build unity in the workplace. Realistic plans may be made for the employees development and growth. The supervisor and the employee review the job description standards and compare the employees accomplishments against the standards set. The data comes from established performance metrics, employee self-assessment and customer or coworker feedback from daily activities. There ar e five levels of the performance rating. dramatic is the highest rating. To get an outstanding rating means the employees contribution to the business far exceeds requirements. The employee is personally committed to the companys mission, values and goals at a lucid level. The employee takes the initiative to identify challenging work goals and tries to find solutions. The employees quality is never a question, even under challenging situations.The next rating is an elegant rating. The employee who receives an excellent rating produces more than required. The employee takes the initiative in developing and finding challenging work goals. Each responsibility is finished with quality and on time. That employee necessarily little direction or supervision. The employee thinks beyond the details of the job and contributes to the objectives of the department. All of the employees decisions and actions are higher than expectations. The next level of rating is commendable. This employee performs what is expected of an see individual in the department. The employees errors are minimal and they have learned from their mistakes, some improvements from them are expected. They schedule projects and work on problems in an orderly manner. They make suggestions and recommendatio... ...spThese conditions do not empower employees. Employees are told what to do and they have a small amount of insight on what their actions are contributing to. Employees feel feeble we are reluctant to take the initiative for fear of doing the wrong thing. We do our jobs as told, and have little sense of personal responsibility or commitment. Our goals are set for what is measurable rather than what goals are important. We have very few interactions with our manager over the course of the year to discuss how things our going. Employees have lack of tuition about the companys goals. We are discouraged from asking for help or coaching assistance from our supervisor. Our goals are assigned t o us without mutual agreement. We mustiness change the organization to give employees the understanding for how our work contributes to the organization. Employees goals are achieved by our freedom to choose the best way to take on these goals. Supervisors must be supportive and actively coach employees. There must be minimum supervisor control and interests of discovering better ways of working. When employees discover this, it will be reflected in our reviews.

Thursday, May 30, 2019

Immanuel Kant Essay -- Immanuel Kant Deontology Ethics

Immanuel KantImmanuel Kant was born, lived and passed away in his home town of Konigsberg. He lived from 1724 to 1804. He studied at the local university and later returned to coach and lecture students. It wasnt until he met an English merchant by the name of Joseph Green that Kant learned of David Hume and began to develop his ideas of morals and values. Kants Critique of Pure tenableness (1781) is believed by many to be his greatest work. Kants was known mainly, however, for his moral code The Categorical Imperative.Immanuel Kant was a follower of Deontology, or duty ethics. This means that for an symbolise to be moral it must be performed out of duty. If you are concerned for the end product of your actions it is not a moral act. Only when your action is make in such a way that your only ...

Wednesday, May 29, 2019

Renaissance Man and Renaissance Women Essay -- essays research papers

Between the 1300s and 1500s, Europe experienced a period of cultural rebirth cognize as the rebirth, marking the transition from medieval times to modern times. The metempsychosis brought new importance to individual expression, self-consciousness and worldly experience.The Renaissance man and cleaning lady characterized the Renaissance ideals. A renaissance man was a well- educated gentleman who had cultural grace, courage and who understood the arts and sciences. On the other hand, a Renaissance woman was supposed to marry well, be loyal to her husband and give birth to boys.The most famous Renaissance man was Leonardo Da Vinci who was born(p) on April 15th 1452 in Florence, Italy. Da Vinci was truly recognized by many to be a Renaissance child and later a Renaissance man because of his many talents. He revealed his artistic talents at the age of 17 when he was hired as a studio boy to Andrea Del Verrocchio, the leading Florentine painter and sculptor of his day. In Verrocchio workshop, Da Vinci was introduced to main techniques, from the painting of altarpieces and panel pictures to the creation of large sculptural projects in marble and bronze. His Last Supper and Mona Lisaare among the most widely popular and influential paintings of the Renaissance. At the same time his scientific interests deepened his concern with anatomy led him to perform dissections. After a period of time, Da Vincis scientific research began to dominate his other activities so much that his artis...

It’s the End of the Worldand I Feel Fine Essay -- essays papers

Its the polish off of the Worldand I Feel FineIts the End of the Worldand I Feel Fine(The role of intellectuals in the creation and justification of nuclear weapons.) In Fail Safe and Dr. Strangelove, Or How I knowledgeable to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb, Sidney Lumet and Stanley Kubrick question the relationship between technology and humanity by emphasizing mankinds tendency to create machines that cannot be adequately controlled. By blatantly revealing the absurdity of game theory (Mutual Assured Destruction as a reasonable deterrence for nuclear war), both directors call into question the overabundant pro-Cold War American ideology. One of the most quintessential aspects of this ideology includes the drive for constant technological advance and strategic superiority. Without the mind-set of the scientists and intellectuals who dedicated their lives to the extension of technological power and the study of international conflict, the Arms Race would certainly not have been possible. These academics not only became the architects of atomic weapons only when they were also faced with justifying the use of these nuclear bombs, and creating a theoretical framework within which nuclear warfare might be appropriately (and rationally) conducted. Within this context, integrity noteworthy parallel between Fail Safe and Dr. Strangelove is the existence (in both films) of a single intellectual genius that actively perpetuates the perception of nuclear packaging and strategy. Indeed, through the graphemeizations of Professor Groeteschele and Dr. Strangelove, both Lumet and Kubrick examine the prominent role of intellectuals (both scientists and theorists) in the creation and justification of nuclear warfare. Ultimately, both Lumet and Kubrick reveal the problems with relying altogether on science and mathematics to resolve international conflict, thus suggesting that modern warfare requires a more humanistic, ethical definition of right and wro ng. Both Fail Safe and Dr Strangelove look as moralizing responses to the dominant American Cold War culture, rhetoric, and political policy. In his article titled Dr. Strangelove (1964) Nightmare Comedy and the ideology of Liberal Consensus, Charles Maland identifies the dominant American cultural paradigm (during the Cold War) as the Ideology of the Liberal Consensus. Maland maintains that the Ideology of the ... ...ocosm of possible nuclear disasters, both directors choose to include a character that embodies the contemporary nuclear intellectual. Indeed, scientists and theoreticians (like Groeteschele and Strangelove) played a prominent role in defining and perpetuating the new Cold War culture. These academics not only became the architects of nuclear bombs further they were also faced with creating a viable theoretical framework within which the use of these weapons would be both recommended and justified. However, both Kubrick and Lumet suggest that in order to make thei r brilliance towards mass destruction and death, intellectuals must give up a portion of their humanity, becoming increasingly more like the devices they create and defend. The mutual catastrophes that conk in Fail Safe and Dr. Strangelove show the inevitability of human weakness and scientific fallibility. Through the development of Professor Groeteschele and Dr. Strangelove, both Lumet and Kubrick illustrate the catastrophic possibilities of relying solely on science and mathematics to resolve international conflicts. Ultimately, modern, high stake warfare requires a more humanistic, ethical code of right and wrong.

Tuesday, May 28, 2019

Hope and Saul Bellow :: Biography Biographies Essays

Hope and Saul Bellow People grow up to respect their elders, their society, and their lifestyle. We learn from the population around us and our own experience. Saul Bellow presents his moral code and the standards that he believes people should follow. His characters experience loneliness and alienation from society. They place blame on the people around them, society, and religion. Each character believes in something hope is everything to them. They think they can promote change and achieve a moral standard. Bellow believes in the human aim. His characters show that no matter what we argon presented with, or what hand fate deals us, we can conquer. Bellow acknowledges the primitive tendencies latent in human beings. target the surface of human civilization, and you will find the beast lying just below. As Frank D. McConnell states the shuddering recognition of how little distant we actually are from the savagery of our origins, how fragile a thing is the civilization which makes, we continue to tell ourselves, our life worth living. Bellows protagonists sense this dark side of the human spirit lurking within society. They struggle to find decency and meaning in the chaos of the world. In Bellows novel The Victim, the main character, Asa Leventhal, a resident of Chicago, struggles with his identity in a tough way. Instead of philosophizing about who he is and what he is doing, he creates conflict with people and society. Allbee lost his job and had a drinking problem, Levanthal could have helped get him a new job or given him assistance. He is insecure about what he is doing, because despite his wish to ignore and turn away his old booster station Kirby Allbee, he also feels compelled to help him. Allbee places all the blame on Levanthal for losing his job. If Levanthal had talked to him and told him it was also due to his drinking problem and relationship difficulties, he would not be demonic for costing Allbee his job. Instead, he takes responsi bility he is unwilling to confront Allbee, wanting none of Allbees problems to invade his life. As Derek Rubin writes in his analysis of Levanthals faults Levanthals being caught between his proclivity to turn Allbee away and his inability to ignore Allbees demand for help is related to his insecurity as a marginal man(1). Kirby tries to reason with Leventhal, but is sullen away Watch your talk, said Leventhal stiffly.

Hope and Saul Bellow :: Biography Biographies Essays

Hope and Saul Bellow People grow up to respect their elders, their society, and their lifestyle. We learn from the people around us and our own experience. Saul Bellow presents his moral code and the standards that he believes people should follow. His characters experience loneliness and lunacy from society. They place blame on the people around them, society, and religion. Each character believes in something hope is everything to them. They think they can promote change and achieve a moral standard. Bellow believes in the hu valet de chambre spirit. His characters show that no matter what we are presented with, or what hand fate deals us, we can conquer. Bellow acknowledges the primitive tendencies possible in human beings. Scratch the surface of human civilization, and you will find the beast lying just below. As Frank D. McConnell states the shuddering recognition of how gnomish distant we actually are from the savagery of our origins, how fragile a thing is the civiliza tion which makes, we continue to tell ourselves, our life worth living. Bellows protagonists sense this fateful side of the human spirit lurking within society. They struggle to find decency and meaning in the chaos of the world. In Bellows novel The Victim, the main character, Asa Leventhal, a resident of Chicago, struggles with his identity operator in a subtle way. Instead of philosophizing about who he is and what he is doing, he creates conflict with people and society. Allbee lost his job and had a drink problem, Levanthal could have helped get him a new job or given him assistance. He is insecure about what he is doing, because despite his wish to ignore and good turn away his old friend Kirby Allbee, he also feels compelled to help him. Allbee places all the blame on Levanthal for losing his job. If Levanthal had talked to him and told him it was also due to his drinking problem and relationship difficulties, he would not be blamed for costing Allbee his job. Instead, he takes responsibility he is unwilling to confront Allbee, wanting none of Allbees problems to invade his life. As Derek Rubin writes in his abbreviation of Levanthals faults Levanthals being caught between his desire to turn Allbee away and his inability to ignore Allbees demand for help is related to his insecurity as a marginal man(1). Kirby tries to reason with Leventhal, but is turned away Watch your talk, said Leventhal stiffly.